Elective democracy is now universally accepted and promoted as the norm for political legitimacy. But whereas most people today can choose politicians to govern their cities, provinces or states and countries, citizens do not vote directly for those who represent us on important global issues at the United Nations.
The United Nations remains hamstrung by the clash of national interests that obstruct social and environmental progress for our global community.
In contrast, 492 million Europeans elect a Parliament which helps the continent manage its common interests, transcending the violent inter-state conflicts of the twentieth century.
The great problems of our times – war, disease, hunger, climate change – require co-operative solutions. Why not give the United Nations a parliamentary dimension to make it more inclusive, more transparent, more collaborative, more accountable and more effective?
Yesterday, I read Terry Glavin's column in the Straight about elements of the peace movement and what he argues is an implicit (and sometimes explicit) support of Hezbollah. Whether you agree with Glavin's analysis or not - and whether you come at
Actions
Make a change
Want to make a change yourself? Choose a topic and start telling us about the changes you want to make:
Post to blog
Want to blog about your changes? First make or join a change.
Post a success story
Want to post a success story on a change? First make or join a change.