Email Hell
What has the working world come to? In the good 'ol days people used to have fullsome conversations, write comprehensive and well thought out memos and letters etc. Now, they pepper you with dozens of erratic and fragmented emails. On average I only get about 1-2 hours of desktime a day but receive 70-80 emails each day as well. Needless to say I don't get through themĀ all and they pile up over the days/weeks. Does anyone have any tips or advice on how to make my In Box less stressful?
Comments
Thanks, subject line only is
Thanks, subject line only is a good idea. Here's a thought - imagine if we were to limit the number of emails everyone in the company could send on any given day to, say, 20. That's it. I bet the quality would improve...
- Login to post comments
But what if everyone's 20
But what if everyone's 20 emails every day were only directed to Sloan? Wouldn't help you much...
- Login to post comments
Just curious -- like you, I
Just curious -- like you, I am frustrated by the number of emails I receive. At the same time, I'm also in the habit of 'sending someone an email' rather than get up to find them, call them, write them a letter, etc. It's definitely a two-way street.
- Login to post comments
Agreed. I'm sure I'm as much
Agreed. I'm sure I'm as much as a problem as the next person...
- Login to post comments






One little hack that I've
One little hack that I've learned and occasionally use is to reply using the subject line only, ending with "(NM)" (for "no message") or "(EOM)" (for "end of message"). It makes life a lot easier for the recipient, who doesn't have to open the message... and, with any luck, encourages them to do the same in their short messages to you.
The incomparable Merlin Mann has a whole gaggle of tips for more effective emailing, both as writer and beleaguered recipient.