White Caps Stadium somehow pulls off deal with Port of Vancouver (isn't the port ultimately responsible to public??)
Now before anyone even starts to think of saying "NIMBY" to me, consider this:
I live a two short blocks away from INSITE, the safe injection site.
Across the street is a soup kitchen, and every morning there are about 50 people lined up.
People who are homeless and sick and very literally don't have a pot to piss in use the park down the street to do so ... and more.
Mentally ill people off their medication wander down my street, and Carroll street, like spectres, ranting and shouting, totally disrupting my workdays.
People who come to go clubbing piss against my building door, and also in their drunken moments smash the streetlights.
The hell's angels club across the street (now closed) had a couple shooting deaths in it, and down the street from me, not more than 2 minutes walk, another club had the death of the innocent young girl who tried to save another's life. I heard those shots in the wee hours of the morning.
So anyone who's about to accuse me of NIMBYISM, I dare you to say it!!
ANYWAY, I'm totally discouraged today about my desire to change the gastown/downtown east side into a place that models integration of those of us with money - and food and shelter - and those of us without.
The reason I'm totally discouraged is that apparently the WhitecapsSoccer people managed to broker some kind of deal with the Port. This is presumably a significant stride forward into the stadium coming into existence at the other end of gastown.
(and please, those of you who are pro the stadium but don't live here, please don't try to tell those of us who are intimately acquainted with the area, and who are trying our d&*$-ist to navigate through complex situations, please don't give any upbeat, naive statements about how a stadium will 'clean up' the area. First, it won't. Exponentially increased vehicle traffic, and post-game visits to the pubs and clubs (the highest per capita in the city, by the way) is not 'cleaning it up'. Secondly, by 'cleaned up', do we mean, 'cast out the homeless and addicts?" or do we mean, 'for gods sake let's provide housing, nursing, substantive support)
OK, now with this ranting, I'm afraid I've portrayed this gorgeous nieghbourhood to bleakly. It's not. There are shopkeepers who create unique, sensitive shops that are a treat to walk into - Urbanity, Inform, Bruce's eyewear among others. There is a sweet little park complete with beach. There is Vancouver's most 'Cheers' -like pub, The Irish Heather. There is the most neighbourly of coffee shops, Blakes, where those of us who live around here actually hang out and have coffee.
And best of all, there are a hell of a lot of us who actually care about the people we rub shoulders with who are begging, ranting, and sleeping outside.
A mammoth stadium is about many wonderful things. It is not about creating a model community that seeks to successfully integrate a few residents, some forward-thinking business owners and layers upon layers of complex (but solvable!!!) issues with the marginalized.
Comments
You're a nimby
You're a nimby
- Login to post comments
You see the situation
You see the situation correctly: this area of our city is extremely disturbing, and replete with human misery. So having recognized that fact, the question is, what do we do?
Nothing?
Become moralistic, assume/argue that the homeless/addicts/mentally ill/impoverished brought this on themselves, and therefore should pull themselves up by the bootstrap?
Try to alleviate the misery, if for no other reason than for our own increased feel-good factor about Vancouver?
If we opt for this, in what way will the stadium help?
Will it 'clean up' the area, like some people say? What does "clean up" mean - sweep up and put in the garbage bin? Sweep it away to somewhere else?
If something more meaningful ... well... WHAT exactly will a stadium do to provide genuine help? Given it's plunking itself right into a community, I would think a first priority would be to find out about the community, and find out how it can be a positive factor.
Will it provide jobs? If so, the kinds of jobs that allow people to get off social assistance, or just part-time McJobs that look good for stats, but have no real value?
Will it contribute food for the hungry? Beds for the addicts who want to get clean? Homes for the mentally ill? I've yet to hear even a murmer of this.
- Login to post comments
I have had enough.. time to
I have had enough.. time to tell it like it is.
I am amazed at how people think a stadium is what Vancouver needs on its waterfront. Stadiums are about looking inward not out. Why are we even wasting our time thinking about this proposal?
Here we have one ultra-rich man who wants the public waterfront as his personal playground. Let us not forget this is a guy who built a massive indoor ice rink on his Whistler property in violation of many city bylaws and zoning regulations. Hell, even Greggie’s best buddy, Peter ladner, mentions on his website how Greggie felt "burnt" over the ice rink - jezzus... "ya broke the law Greggie".
Let us not cry for poor Greggy..he is a good business man.. the man will make money out of this deal regardless if the stadium is built or not. One thing he is attempting to do is to diversify his holdings. That is why he is also buying up property in downtown Vancouver... and the stadium is part of the plan. Dare you to ask the Whitecaps if they plan on building anything else on their waterfront land. They will use terms such as "not at this time" or my fav. "we do not see any development in the next year or two". They never, ever will say "NO" -cause of the pants-on-fire thing.
The supporters of the stadium cry how this is so good for a community to have a stadium... funny, if it is that good why are they not fighting tooth-and-nail to have it in their local park?
Councilor Susan Anton drools over a new stadium because it is so good for vancouver... would she dare to place it in her rich supporters neigbourhood? Never! Why does not Greg Kerfoot who lives in West Vancouver put it there? The answer - they would run him out of town. Can you see the folks in WestVan putting up with loud open air rock concerts most summer nights?
Lets face it. The stadium comes down to a vanity project for one rich guy and a few city politicos who will likely have their election fund topped up if it goes through. The cost to the public - our waterfront, congestion, noise,....
Shame for selling out a neigbourhood!!!
- Login to post comments
Yet another person who
Yet another person who thinks its fine to perpetuate the misery in the DTES. As long as people like you make it acceptable for someone to be homeless or an addict, these people you say you care about will never get help.
The stadium has nothing to do with this. But it really ticks me off when people claim they "own" part of a city, so it's okay if it decays until it becomes an eyesore or dangerous to "outsiders". All of Vancouver is paying dearly for your "privilege" of living in a "gritty" neighbourhood. The sooner it changes, the sooner we can get real help for these unfortunate souls.
- Login to post comments
Yes, Were Does the City Get
Yes, Were Does the City Get Their Brains From?....they have been destroying very good buildings, like The Gomez Place, just because it was full of shitheads....
When my toilet get's full of shit, I just flush the toilet, not smash the hell out of it, like the City Does...
The Lookout Society has taken a lot of buildings and converted them to a homeless and backpackers lair...
When The HAMC were more up front heavily involved with the DTES, things were humming even better than what it is now, but the City Gave the HAMC a lot of money they didn't earn, they were grossly overpaid for their housing investments....and are still lurking in the financial backrounds....
BC Housing has adopted a habit of buying these buildings and gutting out the basements because some Homeless ppl might like live in a basement suite like they do all over the Suburban areas....
The GVRD has taken a lot of foreign money for the olympics, and a re now finding there is a loophole in a lot of bogus cheques, and legal requirements of usage of these revenues.
The city is moving at a police state of madness with excuses that would make a 10 year old puke with disgust to the outright LIES they spewed on a lot of activities they endorsed in the name of communism.
All in all, I am existing, with a few caveats, but only the future in Dec 21, 2012 will tell were it went to.
Bob
- Login to post comments







I worked on the downtown
I worked on the downtown eastside. It got so bad i couldn't wait to leave. I can't wait for this stadium. Hopefully it will turn around that hell hole cuz it can't possibly get any worse with the stadium there.