Change in the way politics has done
I think we need a new politics in Canada. We need to think outside the box about who we are, what we believe in and who is best able to represent our values in the political realm.
I've been involved in politics for most of my adult life, and I've enjoyed almost every moment of it. However, I've increasingly found that the parties that used to represent me don't any more - while I've changed and grown and evolved, they've stayed the same. My support is taken for granted, my views are rarely asked for, and I have become little more than a human ATM and volunteer worker for some of the organizations with whom I have - at one time - chosen to politically aligned myself.
A generational analysis (best articulated for me in Lakhshmi Chaudry's article "Will the Generation Obama Please Stand Up" - http://www.thenation.com/doc/20071203/chaudhry - in the Nation) of politics has helped me get a grip on what the problem is, but I'd like to help create some solutions, too.
I am a progressive person who believes socially responsible business has role to play in our prosperity a community, and should not be looked upon with suspicion. I believe government needs to get directly involved in addressing homelessness, addiction and mental health - the market can't do it on its own (obviously). I believe there need to be authentic opportunities to participate in decisions about our community's future. I believe in rebuilding community and not just in the political sense - I think people need to get off their cellphones and iPods and talk to one another again.
Right now, I'm frustrated, angry and borderline defeatest about the options I have, which often don't seem like options at all. I'd like to propose that it's time for us to create a new politics for Canada.
- I'd like to throw out the old partisan labels and heck, create some new ones (I'm not one of those "free to be you and me" types who things that you can be successful at organizing and making decisions without taking sides).
- I'd like to reform the electoral system at all levels, to throw out the rule books that so many parties and hacks rely upon for their power bases, and elect people based on the popular vote, forcing partisan organizations to change the way they do business and, uh, listen to the people again.
I have this conversation with myself and the occasional friend all the time, and thought I might blog about it with the Changeeverything community and just see if anyone else out there is thinking the same.
Comments
I think some form of pro rep
I think some form of pro rep would be a great start, W. One of the most interesting things about the debate over the single transferrable vote (STV) in B.C. three years ago was how those who have a vested interest in the first-past-the-post system - old-line political parties and apparatchik who have spent a lifetime investing in (and figuring out how to "play") the system - argued so passionately against STV. Many of us have become complacent and "comfortable" with our stunted, predictable version of democracy - even though most of us agree something is broken, old-line parties are loathe to fix it.
Proportional representation would mean a break up of old party alliances and coalitions, while at the same time, creating new ones (I still believe that coalitions and organization are the only way to get things done). Wouldn't it be thrilling if, instead of putting the same old supporters on speed dial for donations and support, political parties would have to do something revolutionary: they'd have to ask for support and convince potential donors or members that they're the best choice. I don't know about you, but I'm tired of being taken for granted.
One of the most thrilling - and inspiring - aspects of Obama's campaign was that very fact that he did not take the support of new donors or members for granted, but knew he had to earn it and keep it. It's that humility that inspired people to support him. However, it's telling that the only way someone like Obama could become president was to buy into America's old-as-the-hills, two-party system. Imagine how vibrant the U.S. democracy would be - and how much harder all parties would work for support - if the 1 per cent that voted for Nader were guaranteed a seat at the democratic (small "d" table")?
- Login to post comments
Yup. Agreed. One struggle is
Yup. Agreed.
One struggle is that these are complex issues, that are difficult to sum up easily. So I'm not sure enough voters know the tradeoffs and can make an insightful decision. Voting on a change like proportional representation becomes more difficult than staying the course for the majority of voters.
We need simple ways of framing these complex issues.
- Login to post comments








Hi Lesli. Do you think
Hi Lesli. Do you think getting rid of the first past the post system would be a start?
A proportional representation system of government would ensure that the 60-something percent of voters who voted for progressive parties would actually get to set a mandate. That, to me, is the main frustrating thing.